|
Post by Los Leandros on Jul 5, 2011 13:25:16 GMT
Would'nt waste my time. Know Fry's & Hitchen's juvenalia off by heart. Two mad barking dogs. Heard about it though. Of course the audience was loaded - get real. Agreed the Catholic side was particularly weak. Could have demolished Fry in one fell swoop, when he introduced the old canard about aids. The retort being, how many athesit run aids hospices are there ?. Duh, none !. In general a mob-pleasing event, not a rational debate. Of much more significance, for this debate, was David Quinns demolition of Dawkins. Catholicism teaches that we are reasonable/rational human beings, unlike determinist/irrational driven atheism. David Quinn stuck rigidly to a rational Catholic based scientific agenda, & simply allowed Dawkins to disappea in a fog of irrationality. So it's quite easy to do in the rigt hands.
|
|
|
Post by Los Leandros on Jul 5, 2011 13:40:46 GMT
Would'nt bother. Know Fry's & Hitchens juvenalia off by heart. Two mad barking dogs. Of course the audience was loaded, a bit like an atheist agm ( or nutters convention ) - get real. Heard about it though. Believe atheists are virtually orgasmic watching their two heroes in action. Pathetic really. Agreed the Catholic side were weak/wimpish. Should have called Fry's childish bluff in relation to aids. How many atheist run aids hospices are there ?. Duh - none !. The real debate though, & much more relevant to this discussion, was David Quinns cool/calm demolition of Dawkins. Catholicism teaches that we are reasonable/rational human beings ( God bless, Thomas Aquinas ), unlike determinist/irrational religions, like atheism. David Quinn stuck rigidly to real science ( as oppossed to Dawkins pseudo version ), to brilliant effect. Presumably you have heard this real debate, its quite famous now !.
|
|
|
Post by David Norris on Jul 5, 2011 18:15:07 GMT
Ha ha ha haaaaaaa
Didnt even watch it!
"I dont have to cos I know is poppycock!!!!"
BRILLIANT!!!!!
Make a decision on someting without being informed about it.
You are some tulip Sir. A real piece of work.
Oh my I really enjoyed that.
Like the people who banned films like "The Life of Brian" in the UK in the late 70's without viewing it because the "Knew" it was bad.
Oh my..... The level of close mindedness in here is gobsmacking!
Its a debate between Catholics and non-theists, youl wont view it, but feel qualified to pass judgement on it?
Surely now..... people of the forum, you see what we have here!
I am actually laughing out loud as I type. This is brilliant fun!!!!
Oh mercy.....
|
|
|
Post by Los Leandros on Jul 6, 2011 8:46:41 GMT
Not everyone is in thrall to your infantile videos. You have'nt responded to the issue. Did you hear David Quinns demolition of loony Dawkins. The great prof. from Oxford. You really are a grovelling sychophant. I've come accross many University prof's. & quite a few are as off the wall as Dawkins. So don't be so in awe of mere mortals. You were supposed to be endowed with a critical faculty - try using it !. Dont just accept puerile atheist dogma as a given.
|
|
|
Post by David Norris on Jul 6, 2011 11:41:02 GMT
Not everyone is in thrall to your infantile videos. You have'nt responded to the issue. Did you hear David Quinns demolition of loony Dawkins. The great prof. from Oxford. You really are a grovelling sychophant. I've come accross many University prof's. & quite a few are as off the wall as Dawkins. So don't be so in awe of mere mortals. You were supposed to be endowed with a critical faculty - try using it !. Dont just accept puerile atheist dogma as a given. Sir.... you are truly lost. Go in peace and my God forgive you for your spite and hatred. You ignorance and lack of education I can forgive, but not the rest. I'll leave that to God.
|
|