|
Post by molagga on Jun 17, 2008 18:14:59 GMT
Alaistdir, do try this little number, if you haven't already. It's a great relief for the cluster-bombing and will ensure that you get a good night's sleep. You deserve it and you will really feel better tomorrow, if not right as rain. Whiskey Fog recipe 2 cups chilled whipping cream 2 tablesthingys granulated sugar 2 tablesthingy Irish or Scotch whiskey 1/2 teasthingy vanilla extract 3/4 cup coarsely crushed crisp macaroons Beat whipping cream, sugar, whiskey and vanilla extract in chilled bowl until stiff. Fold in macaroons. Sthingy into dessert dishes. Sprinkle with additional crushed macaroons if desired. Yields 8 servings. What are you on about??? Too much time on your hands... qui aures habet, audiat........
|
|
|
Post by molagga on Jun 17, 2008 18:24:02 GMT
There is a further update from Fr. Zuelsdorf this evening on the Fota International Liturgy Conference. Here is tyhe latest:
FOTA INTERNATIONAL LITURGY CONFERENCE
Saturday, 12 July 2008
Programme
9.00: Opening 9.15: His Eminence Jorge M. Cardinal Mejia
The Translation Problem. Some observations not only linguistic.
10.00: Professor James Hitchcock The ‘Hermeneutic of Continuity’ in the Church
10.45: Concelebrated Holy Mass in St. Colman’s Cathedral, Cobh.
The Prinicpal Celebrant: His Eminence Jorge M. Cardinal Mejia
Novus Ordo in Latin, Missa Maria, Ianua Coeli [Collectio Missarum B.V.M.]
Music: The Lassus Scholars: Missa Papae Marcelli (Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina)
12.00: Luncheon at Fota
13.30: Dr. Alcuin Reid
The Liturgical Reform of Benedict XVI
14.30: Professor Manfred Hauke
Klaus Gamber, ‘father’ of the ‘new liturgical movement’
15.30: Coffee
16.00: Mrs. Helen Hull Hitchcock
Benedict XVI and the ‘Reform of the Reform’
17.00: Fr. Uwe Michael Lang
Sacred Art in the Thought of Joseph Ratzinger – Pope Benedict XVI [CHANGED]
18.00: Dr. Neil J. Roy
The Roman Canon: Deesis in Euchology
19.00: Professor Dennis McMahon
Translation Theory in Liturgiam Authenticam
20.00: Closing of the Conference
20.30: Gala Dinner
|
|
|
Post by molagga on Jun 17, 2008 18:26:14 GMT
And then, there was this comment which, I think, rather hits the nail on the head:
"Wow! A liturgy conference where the emphasis is on actual liturgy and not on various ways to elevate the laity to be more like Priests! Could a program like this have been possible 3 years ago, even 2 years ago? These are indeed exciting times. I still wonder when the “Church” will get around to a serious look at the topic of liturgical music. We are starting to feel like the ugly stepchild…..
Comment by Chironomo — 17 June 2008 @ 11:58 am"
|
|
|
Post by monkeyman on Jun 17, 2008 19:39:55 GMT
What are you on about??? Too much time on your hands... qui aures habet, audiat........ I think I would have suggested a different quote and no- replying in the Latin language to a statement given in the english tongue doesnt cut the mustard with me. I take it you're a cleric? No?
|
|
|
Post by molagga on Jun 17, 2008 20:07:18 GMT
qui aures habet, audiat........ I think I would have suggested a different quote and no- replying in the Latin language to a statement given in the english tongue doesnt cut the mustard with me. I take it you're a cleric? No? Tut, tut, and you do forget that laity of a certain vintage were educated in the mother tongue. I see no reason to succumb to a monoglotic constraint -especially on a CATHOLIC forum. And, might I add, a quote such as this was once common parlance and currency right acorss Western civilization among even the half educated. Cut mustard, indeed!!
|
|
|
Post by molagga on Jun 17, 2008 20:19:39 GMT
qui aures habet, audiat........ I think I would have suggested a different quote and no- replying in the Latin language to a statement given in the english tongue doesnt cut the mustard with me. I take it you're a cleric? No? And speaking about the english (sic) tongue, it would indeed be no harm were you to go off and learn how to write it with some minimal precision.
|
|
|
Post by Alaisdir Ua Séaghdha on Jun 18, 2008 9:12:25 GMT
Serves me right for not reading properly - I see the Mass at the liturgical conference is in fact Ordinary Form - Latin, or Novus Ordo as it was previously known.
The case that St Colman's Society for Catholic Liturgy was not traditionalist is established; so a lot of time was wasted on these boards. And I agree with Monkeyman - that Molagga has way too much time on his hands.
|
|
|
Post by molagga on Jun 18, 2008 17:37:26 GMT
Serves me right for not reading properly - I see the Mass at the liturgical conference is in fact Ordinary Form - Latin, or Novus Ordo as it was previously known. The case that St Colman's Society for Catholic Liturgy was not traditionalist is established; so a lot of time was wasted on these boards. And I agree with Monkeyman - that Molagga has way too much time on his hands. That Molagga has way too much time on his hands... Well, just let's look at the statistics: Molagga joined the Forum on 1 April (ominous that) and, since then, has made 93 contributions practically all of which are short and usually to the point. On the other hand, Alaistdir joined the Forum on 10 April (Biblical that) and, since then, has made 160 contributions several of which are quite extensive and, we might speculate, in general several time longer than Molagga's. The inference we would have to make here is that Alastdir has nothing useful at all to do in life. And, as for the brace of crubeens swinging from the banana bush, well, since 10 January he has made 17 contributions - most of them illiterate.
|
|
|
Post by monkeyman on Jun 18, 2008 18:39:26 GMT
Molagga, (- thats a Cloyne saint name no?)...anyway straying from point...Now that I see to be the case what I had heard to be the case ie the Mass at the conference would be Novus Ordo I think its only right that I inform all my "tradi" friends of this fact....I nor anyone I know of will be supporting your group because of this...what a shame your group have no metal unlike the Latin Mass Society. Having a Novus Ordo in Latin, given we now have a superior expression of the liturgy in the extraordinary form is frankly rediculous. Pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by Michael O'Donovan on Jun 18, 2008 20:14:23 GMT
Gentlemen (or ladies), please keep it clean. Our atheist friends are reading and we don't want to scandalise them.
Should I create a category for recipes? The late Jennifer Paterson used to have a column in the Spectator where she published special recipes appropriate to Saints' Days.
|
|
|
Post by molagga on Jun 18, 2008 22:26:57 GMT
Having a Novus Ordo in Latin, given we now have a superior expression of the liturgy in the extraordinary form is frankly rediculous. Pathetic. Notwithstanding the customary illiteracy, I do not believe the position here is consonant with the Holy Father's outlook on matters liturgical - especially as expressed in the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum
|
|
|
Post by molagga on Jun 18, 2008 22:35:55 GMT
Molagga, (- thats a Cloyne saint name no. Both Cloyne and Dublin (Balbriggan) On Molagga: "St. Molagga (Laicin, Molacca) of Fermoy, Abbot -------------------------------------------------------- Died c. 664. The Irish Molagga was raised in Wales under Saint David (Dewi; f.d. March 1). He founded a monastery at Fulachmhin (Fermoy), and is much venerated in northern Cork nearby. He is also associated with Balbriggan in Dublin (Benedictines, Montague)."
|
|
|
Post by molagga on Jun 18, 2008 22:39:48 GMT
Labbamolagga Church
Impressive early mediaeval church, with enclosure, reputedly founded in the 7th century by St. Molagga. The graveyard contains an early church and a later mediaeval structure, as well as an Early Christian grave slab that is believed to mark Molagga's burial place. The enclosure is unique. The graveyard also has 'Clogha Molagga' - Molagga's cursing stones. In an adjoining field there is a 'stone circle' which was excavated in the 1930s.
'Clogha Molagga'
I think I might just start to project a few of these into the bannana bush!
|
|
|
Post by mcallister on Jun 23, 2008 19:19:23 GMT
This is getting kinda interesting. So we've suddenly dropped all the ordinary/extraordinary form, two forms of the same rite, we all love each other anyway type of attitude that usually so politely colours these conversations. Well, well, well! Are the masks slipping? Now you are saying the EF is superior?
|
|
|
Post by molagga on Jun 23, 2008 21:52:06 GMT
Molagga, (- thats a Cloyne saint name no?)...anyway straying from point...Now that I see to be the case what I had heard to be the case ie the Mass at the conference would be Novus Ordo I think its only right that I inform all my "tradi" friends of this fact....I nor anyone I know of will be supporting your group because of this...what a shame your group have no metal unlike the Latin Mass Society. Having a Novus Ordo in Latin, given we now have a superior expression of the liturgy in the extraordinary form is frankly rediculous. Pathetic. Just to allay any possible confusion: the abandonment of the distinction between ordinary and extraordinary form of the same rite was made by Monkeyman while swinging out of a banana bush.
|
|